Thursday, June 25, 2009

Economic Potential and relevance of Biofuel program in India

SUGARCANE ETHANOL – ACHIEVABLE BIOFUEL TARGET

In 2006, India was the seventh largest net importer of oil in the world. With 2007 net imports of 1.8 million bbl/d, India is currently dependent on imports for 68 percent of its oil consumption.EIA expects India to become the fourth largest net importer of oil in the world by 2025.

Alcohol requirement:

Alcohol based chemical Industries: 1,100 million Lts.

Potable Alcohol requirement: 1,000 million Lts.

@5% ethanol Blending : 600 million Lts.

@10% ethanol Blending : + 600 million Lts.

----------------------------

3,300 Million Lts.

India produces 1.3 billion Lts and requires almost 2 billion Lts if it has to cater 10% blending.

Petrol Consumed in 2006-07: 9,295,000MT.Only 0.64% of petrol is replaced with Ethanol.

Alcohol at 10% level requires another 10-15 million Klts, so a possible acreage growth of 25-30Million ton based on price rewarded to farmer. We have been discussing only Road; we are yet to talk of Rail, Ocean, and Air Freight using Ethanol.

Potential for ethanol in India

The direct employment potential is likely to be at least 50 times that of a Petroleum refinery.

A 6 billion liters ethanol production could save an estimated around US$1 billion in foreign exchange in diesel / petrol equivalent. This in turn would provide an additional income per year to the tune of Rs 13000 Crores at an average price of Rs. 1300 per tone. Petrol consumption in India during 2006-07 is 9,295,000 MT and only 0.64% of petrol is replaced with Ethanol.

At 10 per cent levels India would need at least 1,200 million liters of ethanol. Purchases of sugarcane, the primary feedstock for ethanol production would be about Rs 12,600 crore at current prices.

Year

Gasoline

Demand

MMT

Ethanol

Demand

Th KL

Molasses

Production

MMT

Ethanol production

Utilisation of ethanol

Molasses

Th KL

Cane

Th KL

Total

Th KL

Potable

Th KL

Industry

Th KL

Balance

Th KL

2001-02

7.07

416.14

8.77

1775

0

1775

648

600

527

2006-07

10.07

592.72

11.36

2300

1485

3785

765

711

2309

2011-12

12.85

756.35

11.36

2300

1485

3785

887

844

2054

2016-17

16.4

965.30

11.36

2300

1485

3785

1028

1003

1754

Sugarcane

Area Under Sugarcane : 3,329,000 hectares
Production of Sugarcane (Yield) : 65 MT/Hectare
No of Factories in Operation : 500 & above
Average capacity of factory : 3500 Tone Per Day
Molasses Production : 6,500,000 MT
Molasses Percentage : 4.4%
Percapita Consumption of Sugar : 20 Kg
Percapita Consumption of Jaggery : 5Kg


Of the Total Cane Production:

12% will go in to Seed purpose and 5% goes to Chewing and Juice manufacturing.
25-30% will go in to Khandasari and Jaggery Production.
Only 60% is being used for Sugar production.

Policy handicaps

  • The sugar industry is eagerly waiting for a reduction in excise duty on molasses, which is currently high at Rs 750 a tone. The sugar industry has also sought for placing ethanol in the "special category of goods" under clause 5A of the Central Sales Tax Act, so that the state governments will not impose local taxes on this commodity.
  • The government has not been giving due diligence to Ethanol Blending and Incentives like Biodiesel. Each Individual state has its own policy for blending Ethanol as they have their own Potable alcohol requirements which are major revenue earners and excepting UP most states need to accept Juice conversion to Ethanol. Excise revenues of Alcohol are 30,000 Crores. Trading and Excise regulations should be Uniform across all states decontrolling Sugar.
  • Ethanol price should be on par with MTBE or Biodiesel looking at it as Oxygenate, rather than Calorific value. Also Blending should be at Pump with Proper Monitoring as this could generate possible CDM.
  • Allow Ethanol manufacturing from Juice and also utilize Transgenetics for Ethanol.

Focal areas

  • Sugarcane Cultivation has been dropping drastically due to Agronomical, Management failures handicapped by Labor shortage and Lack of Incentives.
  • New revenue streams to better financial health of sector like Fortified sugar, Chemicals, Bioplastics be looked in to.
  • Work on Carbon, Energy and water Footprint across entire value chain to reduce Pollutants and develop possible CDM templates.
  • Allow free trade of ethanol and develop requisite infrastructure as Ethanol is Hygroscopic and also a Class A product with high Flash/Fire point.
  • Manufacture multiplex vehicles.
  • Work on 2G distillation, Feedstock's supporting such initiatives with possible partnerships.
  • Indian sugarcane Industry is facing acute shortage in manpower to Harvest and its cost. For above a year Industry has realised importance of harvesting machines and have been importing few from China, Thailand etc. Yet the pricing and numbers are key to its propagation. India being the second largest producer of cane is lagging in bringing Innovation and building patents which also could have been major source of Income.Mahindras have built Tractor based harvesters which is under field tests.
  • Yeast and Enzyme market is slowly expanding in spite of Pricing Constraints. Major Players like Novozyme, Genencor, Abmauri, Enzyme India, Richcore life sciences have presence. Yeast, Enzymes and catalysts are key to success of Biofuel production and we need to build this Portfolio as we have competition on Pricing from China.
  • Biomass and its abundance is Critical Component to Biofuels production. Apart to Sugarcane, Sweet Sorghum should be propagated by Sugar Barons as its available round the year and same infrastructure could be optimally utilized. Biomass also generates Bagasse for Cogen and also for producing Compostable plastics. We can slowly move towards Butanol from Ethanol in coming years with enough research in place.

Various Revenue Streams

  • The IEA says that the sugar sector has a potential to produce 5,100 MW of power through cogeneration, which is 69 percent of total capacity. If the resources and technology are improved, can produce almost 10,000 MW or 40 percent of the country's 2008 power deficit. This Generates almost 5000 Crore worth CER’s.
  • The Indian sugar industry has a turnover of Rs. 700 billion per annum and contributes almost 22.5 billion to central and state exchequer every year.
  • The enzyme utilization by Sugar Industry: $19M.
  • If Sugarcane is successful to be proved as Carbon Sink then possible CDM is in several Millions.
  • Employment and revenue in secondary,teritiary functions of Sugar Cultivation,Harvest,Milling,Trade is highest compared to any Food Crop.
  • Since Cellulose content is almost double compared to other crops and the possibility of enforcement of usage of Bioplastics opens new avenues as Market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 129.8 percent in the next five to seven years.
  • Fortified Sugar and Low GI Sugar are catching attention of Urban Consumer.

Ethanol infrastructure

  • If successfully implemented blending program would enable usage of new flex vehicles which would be a major contributor of Technology and revenue.
  • Domestic infrastructure of higher capacities would be required both at Mill, Terminal for blending along with New Pump outlets. Also would require shore tanks and Pipelines with Class A facilities for export Trade.
  • Uniform quality Analysis centers at all Distillation centers.
  • New Stainless steel Tank Trucks for Transporting Ethanol from Mill to Terminals.
  • Fire Safety Centers at all locations of Manufacturing, Blending, Sale.
  • Same infrastructure could be used for Butanol.

Role of Renewable in Sugar

  • Use solar for seed treatment, Distillation, Sugar milling, Bagasse drying, waste treatment operations.
  • Move from Grid based Cogeneration to Storage technologies which would generate higher revenues.
  • Use Cellulose to optimize revenues.

Replicating Proactive Brazilian Model

  • President Lula's proactive media approach to negate food versus fuel controversy and finding Markets should be replicated by India.
  • Australia also has vibrant Sugar Policy.
  • Indian Print, Electronic media should be highlighted the negligence of this Huge Potential Industry.
  • We should closely work with Policy makers to discuss and bring in Proactive changes which benefit this sector.
  • Should if necessary seek legal course to counter actions which are hurting Industry collectively.
  • Need to Understand the Importance of building Common Platforms alike Brazil,AU,Cuba etc, as will be easy to Voice Collectively.
  • Research and Funding should be given due Importance as we are quite lagging behind the above three and very many others.
  • Soil , water and Air should be given attention to better practices, Yields in Sugar. Propagate impact on health by Emissions from Various fuels and also Economics with Crudes impact on national GDP.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Bioplastics

Life-Cycle Economy The principle of sustainable development and the missing landfill in Europe are reasons for the introduction of the closed loop economy in the European Union. Products have to be produced and used resource conserving and have to be recovered after use, if they cannot be avoided at all. Landfill of waste is not allowed anymore. Therefore the question of disposal already comes up during the development of a product. If easy to dispose materials are used for the production, the disposal cost will decrease and in consequence also the over all product costs. Bioplastics have been developed according to these guidelines, in which composting is considered to bet the most cost-effective method of disposal. Only by using renewable ressources an actual closed loop can be realized. Life cycle analyses: Assessing the environmental impactAssessments of the impact of products on the environment require objective and standardized criteria. Life-cycle analyses complying with ISO 14040 are a suitable means of quantifying the impact of products on the environment. Their primary use in industry is to optimise process-engineering aspects of production with regard to the environment.
© Plantic
There are other tools that companies can employ to help them assess production methods and product performance as a way of describing environmental impact, for example EPD – Environmental Product Declaration. Basically, the entire life cycle of the product has to be considered – manufacture, use phase and disposal. With bioplastics, it is primarily the use of annually renewable raw materials in production that positively influences on energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Life-cycle analyses so far have shown that the values are at least 20% better than those for commodity polymers. A preliminary calculation within the European Climate Change Program ECCP returns a primary CO2 savings potential of approx. 4 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents. This figure is based on the assumption that the bioplastics market, given the appropriate supportive framework conditions, will have grown to around one million tonnes.Recovery OptionsThe objective of the EU to close material cycles has led to a different understanding and handling of the term waste: waste can be regarded as "raw material for new after life options". Bioplastics have been designed on the idea of a closed loop material management – like it is found in nature.Bioplastics can be recovered and recycled like conventional plastics by all available methods: thermal recovery, back to plastics and chemical recovery.Unlike conventional plastics most bioplastics types can organically recycled by composting, provided that they comply with EN 13432 criteria. Diverse examinations and studies show that there is no "best" option in recovery and recycling for plastics. Ecological and economical evaluation results differ when regarding different application of plastics, even if the same resin type is regarded.Composting is a useful and often preferred method for mulchfilm and biowaste bags, lso for gardening articles and shoppers offering the "second life option" of being also a organic waste bag. In all these applications biodegradability is an added value. Used food packaging can be processed with high eco-efficiency by composting, especially when short life easily spoiled food is packed. Then the packaging can be recovered together with the spoiled content without further treatment. Nevertheless the eco-efficiency is depending also on the given infrastructure at a place or in a region.Short characterisation of recovery options for bioplastics:
Thermal recovery: Using the high calorimetric value of the substance to produce heat and electricity (criteria of the legislation have to be met) Organic recycling (composting): The resulting compost is used to improve the soil quality and as a replacement of fertilisers Chemical recycling: Can be an option especially for polyester types like PLA or PHA. By chemical treatment the polymer chain can be de-polymerised, the resulting monomers can be purified and polymerised again. Sufficient amounts of source separated collected plastic waste is a pre-condition to apply this method. The same arguments apply for recycling back to plastics.Composting Biodegradation of a bioplastic film© BASFMany types of bioplastics can be composted. Microbes, like bacteria or funghii with their enzymes are able to "digest" the polymer chain structure as a source of nutrition. The resulting end products are water and carbon dioxide CO2 and a little biomass. It is the chemical structure of a polymer, especially the type of chemical bond, that defines whether and to what extend in given time microbes can biodegrade the material. This is the reason why also certain synthetic polymers can be composted – but most others (polyolefines like PE, PP, PS, PET) not.The speed of biodegradation is depending on
Temperature (50-70°C are typical for a industrial composting process) Humidity – water is required for the process The number and types of microbes Only if all three pre-requirements are given the speed of degradation is fast. In the food supply chain, in supermarkets or at home biodegradation occurs at a very low speed in comparison to composting. If one is missing degradation is almost blocked.In a industrial composting facility certified bioplastic products are converted into biomass, water and CO2 within 6-12 weeks. Such facilities exist in many EU countries and regions, e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Scandinavia, parts of Belgium, Northern Italy – have a look on the website of the European Composting Network. Organic household waste is collected by source separation from residual waste, e.g. in biobins (Abbildung), and treated in composting plants to produce quality compost. 30% (weight) of the household waste is of organic origin, e.g. food scraps or gardening waste. Compostable bioplastic products can make use of the existing composting infrastructure and thus be recycled organically – in a very cost efficient way. However compliance with the composting system has to be proven: This has to be done by fulfilling the standardised test criteria of EN 13432. For the approval and labelling of bioplastics products based on EN 13432 the industry together and other involved parties have developed a certification scheme.The combined recovery and organic recycling of compostable bioplastic products (here: packaging) together with organic household waste has been examined in the Kassel project 2001-2003.LitteringLittering refers to careless discarding of rubbish. Bioplastics are often regarded as a possible solution to this dilemma as they can be decomposed by microorganisms without producing harmful or noxious residue during decomposition. Littering is not a legitimate means of waste disposal, therefore biopackaging alone does not provide an adequate solution. Compostable packaging is however optimised for recovery in composting operations. Temperatures of up to 70°C and higher humidity are required for their rapid decomposition in 6-12 weeks. Such conditions are virtually never existent in nature, which means that decomposition can take considerably longer. Even under ideal decomposition conditions, they remain recognisable as packaging for a period of time, and represent an unattractive blight on the landscape.It is imperative for the consumer to continue to be conscious of the fact that no matter what type of packaging, it must be subject to a regulated recovery process. This is the only possibility for re-use and recycling to occur.